HormuzEye logo

Interactive tool

Hormuz Risk Monitor & Scenario Simulator

Editor-curated Strait of Hormuz risk level, live market context and an educational scenario simulator — not a trading signal, but insight into oil price sensitivity.

Hormuz risk gauge

Editorial risk assessment based on naval, insurance, diplomatic and supply factors. Updated when market conditions warrant.

As of July 2026, Hormuz transit remains contested. A US–Iran memorandum of understanding on 17 June opened a diplomatic channel, but restricted tanker flows, elevated war-risk insurance and sustained naval presence keep the chokepoint at high risk.

  • Naval activity

    30%

    US and allied naval escorts continue in the Gulf of Oman; Iranian fast-attack craft maintain a visible presence near the strait mouth.

    Weight: 30%. High

  • Tanker insurance

    25%

    War-risk premiums remain 3–5× pre-crisis levels for Gulf transits; several underwriters still require additional security declarations.

    Weight: 25%. High

  • Diplomatic tension

    25%

    The US–Iran 14-point MoU sets a 60-day window for a final agreement; failure to extend could reintroduce blockade rhetoric.

    Weight: 25%. High

  • Spare capacity

    20%

    Pipeline reroutes (Petroline, ADCOP) can offset ~2.6 Mb/d, but most Gulf spare capacity remains inside the Hormuz transit zone.

    Weight: 20%. High

Scenario simulator

Model a disruption and see an estimated Brent price range based on live market data.

50%
0%100%
Disruption duration

Saudi East–West Petroline + UAE ADCOP (~2.6 Mb/d combined offset)

SPR / strategic release

Estimated Brent range

Extreme price pressure — full or prolonged blockage exceeds the absorption capacity of pipelines, SPR and commercial stocks.

Methodology & limitations

The model assumes ~20 Mb/d of crude and products via Hormuz (~20% of global liquids consumption, source: EIA) against a global consumption baseline of ~103 Mb/d (IEA).

Effective supply loss = blockage severity × 20 Mb/d − pipeline offset (max 2.6 Mb/d if active) − SPR dampening (0 / 1 / 2 Mb/d).

Price impact via short-run demand elasticity |ε| = 0.04–0.08: %ΔP = (%Δsupply) / |ε|. Longer duration amplifies via inventory drawdown (multiplier 0.4× at 3 days to 1.6× at 90 days). Total effect capped at +250%.

Dollar figures are calculated from the current live Brent spot price. When data is unavailable, only the percentage range is shown.

Factors not modelled: currency effects, competition for alternative routes, OPEC+ response, refining bottlenecks and speculative futures positioning.

Disclaimer: this is an illustrative educational model, not a forecast or financial advice. HormuzEye provides informational market analysis only. Oil markets are volatile; always do your own research.

Historical precedents

Past Hormuz-related disruptions and their observed oil price effects — for context, not prediction.

  1. ~$28

    Tanker War

    Iran and Iraq attacked each other's oil tankers and export infrastructure in the Persian Gulf, disrupting Hormuz transit and raising war-risk premiums across the region.

    Observed price effect: Brent rose from ~$28 to ~$40/bbl (+40%) over the period; insurance costs surged independently of spot prices.

    Event 1 of 6
  2. ~$20

    Kuwait invasion

    Iraq's invasion of Kuwait removed ~4 Mb/d from global supply overnight. Hormuz traffic continued but markets priced a potential broader Gulf conflict.

    Observed price effect: Brent doubled from ~$20 to ~$40 within weeks; briefly spiked above $40 on Hormuz closure fears.

    Event 2 of 6
  3. ~$5

    Iran closure threats

    Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz amid tightening Western sanctions on its oil exports, prompting US naval deployments and EU embargo discussions.

    Observed price effect: Brent added a ~$5–10/bbl geopolitical premium; peaked near $128/bbl in March 2012 on broader supply concerns.

    Event 3 of 6
  4. ~15%

    Tanker attacks & Abqaiq

    Six tankers were damaged near Hormuz in May–June; in September, drone strikes hit Saudi Aramco's Abqaiq processing facility, removing ~5.7 Mb/d temporarily.

    Observed price effect: Brent jumped ~15% on the Abqaiq strike (largest single-day move in decades); Hormuz tanker attacks added ~$2–4/bbl risk premium.

    Event 4 of 6
  5. ~8%

    Red Sea / Houthi rerouting

    Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping forced tankers to reroute around Africa, increasing transit times and costs for Gulf exports — a stress test for alternative Hormuz bypass routes.

    Observed price effect: Brent rose ~8% in Q1 2024 on rerouting costs; freight rates for Suez–Asia routes tripled, indirectly supporting Gulf export premiums.

    Event 5 of 6
  6. $65

    Iran conflict & Hormuz disruption (ongoing)

    Regional hostilities that began on 28 February severely disrupted Strait of Hormuz transit. A US–Iran memorandum of understanding signed on 17 June established a diplomatic framework, but tanker passage remains restricted and contested.

    Observed price effect: Brent rose from roughly $65/bbl before the conflict to above $100/bbl at the peak; prices remain elevated while transit restrictions persist.

    Event 6 of 6

In-depth analysis on Hormuz risk and oil prices.